Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery ; : 163-166, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-101285

ABSTRACT

The management of patellae with a severe bony deficiency during revision total knee arthroplasty is a challenging problem. However, using a technique of augmentation with transcortical wiring of an onlay-type prosthesis allowed the authors to revise a deficient patellae successfully. After making the decision to revise the existing patellar component, the procedure was found to be technically straightforward. Furthermore, the procedure does not require sophisticated instruments, only an onlay-type prosthesis, cement and wires. This technique entails fixing wires to the three pegs of the patellar component, passing the wires through drill holes in the anterior cortex and, after compression of a cemented prosthesis, augmenting the fixation by twisting the wires anteriorly. We believe that stable fixation and painless articulation will be obtained with the described technique for deficient patellae.


Subject(s)
Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Middle Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Bone Cements , Bone Wires , Knee Prosthesis , Patella/surgery , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Implantation/methods
2.
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association ; : 347-355, 2010.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-655703

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty using the extramedullary technique for alignment has some difficulty for detecting the center of the femoral head intra-operatively. In this study we tried to evaluate the usefulness and accuracy of a newly developed Mechanical Axis Marker that synchronizes the center of the knee joint and femoral head with the mechanical axis for the distal femoral cutting and femoral prosthesis alignment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2008 and January 2009, 255 knees in 156 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty. We measured the distance between each centers of the femoral head using the PACS system and we applied the distance to the newly developed Mechanical Axis Marker. Subsequently, we applied the new marker to patients to align the centers of knee, the femoral head and the marker in line with the mechanical axis intra-operatively. The accuracy of the marker was validated with C-arm fluoroscopy pre-operatively in 20 patients. Post-operatively we measured and analyzed the frontal femoral component angle to evaluate the coronal alignment of the femoral implant. The accuracy was rated as excellent when the alignment was 5degrees. RESULTS: The pre-operative validation study with the C-arm fluoroscopy showed that the distance between the femoral head center and the metal peg of the marker was within 5 mm in 95% of the patients, which implied acceptable accuracy. The average frontal femoral component angle against the mechanical axis was 89.0degrees+/-1.1 (range 86degrees-96.6degrees). The proportion of excellent, good, and poor alignments was 90.6% (231 cases), 8.6% (22 cases), and 0.8% (2 cases), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the two observers for the frontal femoral component angle was 0.972 which showed high concordance. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the extramedullary technique assisted by our new Mechanical Axis Marker can easily identify the center of femoral head and improve the accuracy of frontal femoral component alignment with the proper mechanical axis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty , Axis, Cervical Vertebra , Fluoroscopy , Head , Knee , Knee Joint , Prostheses and Implants
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL